Many companies work with more complex terminology than just a glossary which could make adding terms quite a daunting process as the translator may not be responsible for completing all the fields.  So MultiTerm provides for this by supporting the use of "Input Models".  You can create a model that only exposes the parts of the termbase for entry that are needed so the process becomes easier.

If you work with "Input Models" then your view could look like this, for example:

Here I created two models, one that would only expose the term making it really simple when you add a new entry, and the other that might expose more fields for a terminologist working in MultiTerm.

The termbase viewer is also useful because when you search in the small simplified window that you found you can also "View Term" from there and this will display the full details of that term in this termbase viewer.  In my screenshot you can see a rough example of something that contains a lot more information than just the terms and obviously you would not want to see this with just simple term recognition or search.

Hope that explained it a little?

thanks
좋은 정보입니다.

Yes, "Model".. sounds good
I like models such as Tori Praver, too.

nice day !!

Using input models in SDL MultiTerm Desktop is really useful in a corporate environment with multiple users (or even if you are a freelancer). An input model will allow you to even include instructions in each field. In this example, we simply included prompts like "[fill in the blank]" and "[if available]" which will go away once you enter your information. In addition, you can make your fields mandatory, as well. The prompt will remain if you don't type in anything.

I posted about input models a few months ago. You may find it useful. Please go here (post of 19-Jul-18): https://community.sdl.com/product-groups/translationproductivity/studio-beta-group/f/37/t/18932

In addition, have you tried Tb-Scout to explore your termbases? https://appstore.sdl.com/language/app/tb-scout-sdl-multiterm-scout/773/

Right, you have the point.

For me, I do not need that kind of brilliant features.
I am satisfied with extremely simple, clear and easy functions.

Anyway, it should be not bad to skim somebody others nice tip.
So, I have checked your two links.
I have troubled with both of them.

First one (maybe wrong address)

Second (security warning)

good day !!