Quality of LC translation?

SDL offers quite a few different MT options, but I find it confusing to see which is which, what are the costs and what is the quality.

As far as I am concerned, DeepL is the benchmark for English-German translations, and I know from colleagues who say the same about English-French.

What I really like about SDL's cloud stuff is the possibility to prescribe the use of certain terms through the Termbase integration. The free LC version that comes with Studio is definitely inferior to DeepL. But there are other options. I would like to know what their quality is (can I test them?), what their cost is?

Could somebody once compile a list with products and costs (I am only interested with products that can be integrated in Studio).

That would be helpful.Thanks in advance.

Daniel

Parents Reply
  • Hi  

    Version of LC: It's the free one that comes with Studio. The "update" checkbox is available, but Paul said it would not be adaptive yet. I've tested it a bit just now, and it's about 3 leagues above the former LC. Very significantly better.

    The main thing about the LC (the USP if you want) is the fact that you can upload a MT Termbase as a glossary. This NMT engine does not support that yet, but Paul said it would come soon.

    I hope there will be an LC option for small teams. At the moment the price jump from Freelancer to Business is too big.

    Difference to BeGlobal: A question for I guess.

    Daniel

Children