Quality of LC translation?

SDL offers quite a few different MT options, but I find it confusing to see which is which, what are the costs and what is the quality.

As far as I am concerned, DeepL is the benchmark for English-German translations, and I know from colleagues who say the same about English-French.

What I really like about SDL's cloud stuff is the possibility to prescribe the use of certain terms through the Termbase integration. The free LC version that comes with Studio is definitely inferior to DeepL. But there are other options. I would like to know what their quality is (can I test them?), what their cost is?

Could somebody once compile a list with products and costs (I am only interested with products that can be integrated in Studio).

That would be helpful.Thanks in advance.

Daniel

Parents Reply
  • All good questions and you'll need to wait for full details.  I can tell you that it won't be adaptive yet, although the NMT is probably already better than adaptive SMT.  This will probably be a future enhancement.  There won't be dictionary support yet either, but this is something we will be working on as a priority.

    Details of a free version for users of Studio... I think you need to wait for the release.  It's not far away.

    Paul Filkin | RWS

    Design your own training!
    You've done the courses and still need to go a little further, or still not clear? 
    Tell us what you need in our Community Solutions Hub

Children