Daniel Ihrig 

The Analysis report does confirm how many segments are new and therefore by extension completed using NMT

Annoyingly the context pane does reflect which provide was used, but no report that I am aware of that will clarify how many segments were done via LC, DeepL ect. 

But to answer 
 

Daniel Ihrig said:

translated with NMT/Machine Translation but corrected by translators?

Post-Edit and Compare is what you need: https://appstore.rws.com/Plugin/15

On a Separate topic, have you seen MT Comparison, that provides you with the ability to pre-translate the project with up to five different Machine Translation providers at a time, and
generate a single report in Excel with the results of each engine side by side.This makes the review of the translations much easier to compare.

Keen to see what others may advise you

Lyds

Daniel Ihrig 

The Analysis report does confirm how many segments are new and therefore by extension completed using NMT

Annoyingly the context pane does reflect which provide was used, but no report that I am aware of that will clarify how many segments were done via LC, DeepL ect. 

But to answer 
 

Daniel Ihrig said:

translated with NMT/Machine Translation but corrected by translators?

Post-Edit and Compare is what you need: https://appstore.rws.com/Plugin/15

On a Separate topic, have you seen MT Comparison, that provides you with the ability to pre-translate the project with up to five different Machine Translation providers at a time, and
generate a single report in Excel with the results of each engine side by side.This makes the review of the translations much easier to compare.

Keen to see what others may advise you

Lyds

Hey,

thx a lot for the good input. Now I have to learn a bit more, which is fine. :-)

In general I had hoped that I could see that in the standard analysing report here where in this test only 0% are shown, but actually around 70% were translated as a context match coming from NMT.

Have a nice weekend