Dear Trados Leadership Team and Product Managers,
I am writing from Sao Paulo, Brazil, to express my deep concern and dissatisfaction regarding the current commercial strategy for Trados Studio 2026, specifically the drastic price increases and the aggressive push toward subscription-based software models. As a long-standing user who has relied on Trados as an industry-standard CAT tool, I believe the current direction misaligns with the economic realities and fundamental needs of independent language professionals, especially those living in poor countries in Latin America, like me and hundreds of thousands of other high qualified translators in this part of the globe.
I strongly urge the executive leadership to consider the following points:
- Defending Perpetual Licensing over Forced Subscriptions: Software subscription models are deeply unfavorable to freelance translators and small practices. A perpetual license provides essential operational security, cost predictability, and true ownership of our primary working tools. Forcing users toward recurring SaaS payments turns software from an asset into an ongoing liability, leaving linguists vulnerable to losing access to their critical tools and workflows if market conditions fluctuate. A permanent, perpetual license option must remain a core, accessible pillar of the Trados offerings.
- Unsustainable Disparity Between Tool Costs and Market Rates: While the cost of Trados licenses and upgrades has escalated sharply, market rates for translation services have remained stagnant or experienced downward pressure due to broader economic conditions and machine translation post-editing. A steep increase in CAT tool software overhead severely erodes the profit margins of individual translators who form the foundation of the Trados ecosystem.
- Value Realization vs. Incremental Features: While new features and AI integrations are welcome developments, a significant portion of our daily workload remains grounded in core translation memory, terminology, and desktop file processing. The current price-to-value ratio for periodic upgrades—and particularly for recurring subscription fees—is becoming increasingly difficult to justify when compared to lighter, more cost-effective alternatives.
Independent linguists require financial stability, transparency, and the freedom to choose how they license their tools. I strongly request that RWS reconsider its pricing structure for Trados Studio 2026, especially here in Latin America (including Brazil) where people’s income is much lower than those in first-world countries, maintain fair and viable upgrade pathways for individual users, and reaffirm a long-term commitment to traditional perpetual licenses.
Thank you for your time, and I trust that leadership will take this community feedback into serious consideration now to readjust prices for LatAm (including Brazil) and when shaping future commercial policies.
Sincerely,
Marcio Tondin
Professional Translator / Long-Time Trados User
Translate